Our News

Adaptability Analysis of PAC and PAM for Different Water Qualities

2025-05-14

PAC和PAM对不同水质的适应性分析

In water treatment applications, Poly Aluminum Chloride (PAC) and Polyacrylamide (PAM) are two of the most commonly used coagulants. Each possesses unique chemical properties and application ranges, requiring careful selection based on water characteristics. This article provides a detailed analysis of PAC and PAM adaptability for different water qualities to help optimize your selection.

 

1. Basic Properties Comparison

Property PAC (Poly Aluminum Chloride) PAM (Polyacrylamide)
Chemical Type Inorganic polymer coagulant Organic polymer flocculant
Charge Type Cationic Anionic/Cationic/Nonionic options
Mechanism Charge neutralization Adsorption bridging
Floc Character Dense, fast-settling Large but loose
pH Range 5.0-9.0 3.0-10.0

 

2. Optimal Selection for Different Water Types

(1) High Turbidity Surface Water

PAC Advantages:

-Excellent for high turbidity water (>100 NTU)

-Rapid floc formation and settling

-Relatively low cost

PAM Synergy:

-As coagulant aid to enlarge flocs

-Improves settling and filtration

Recommended: PAC as primary (20-50mg/L) with anionic PAM (0.5-2mg/L)

(2) Low Turbidity Water

PAM Advantages:

-More effective for low turbidity (<10 NTU)

-Molecular chain adsorption of fine particles

-No excessive metal ions introduced

PAC Limitations:

-Poor performance when used alone

-Risk of aluminum residue exceeding standards

Recommended: Cationic PAM (1-3mg/L) as primary, with minimal PAC (5-10mg/L) if needed

(3) Industrial Wastewater

Oily Wastewater:

-Cationic PAM most effective

-Excellent demulsification and oil removal

Dyeing Wastewater:

-PAC shows superior decolorization

-Combine with nonionic PAM

Paper Mill Effluent:

-High charge density cationic PAM

-PAC improves COD removal

(4) Sludge Dewatering

PAM Superiority:

-Cationic PAM is the optimal choice

-Significantly enhances dewatering efficiency

-Reduces sludge moisture content

PAC Limited Role:

-Only as conditioning agent

 

3. Selection Considerations

Water Quality Analysis:

-Key parameters: turbidity, pH, organic content

-Jar testing recommended for optimization

Cost Evaluation:

-PAC: lower unit price but higher dosage

-PAM: higher price but lower dosage

Downstream Impact:

-PAC may increase metal ions in effluent

-PAM residues may affect membrane processes

Seasonal Variations:

-Adjust PAC ratio for rainy season high turbidity

-Special attention to PAM dissolution in winter

 

Conclusions & Recommendations

PAC and PAM each have distinct advantages and are often used in combination. Selection should consider:

-Water characteristics (turbidity, pH, contaminants)

-Treatment objectives (clarification, dewatering, phosphorus removal)

-Economic factors

-Downstream process requirements

 

Pro Tip: Always conduct lab tests before full-scale implementation. We offer free technical consultation and sample testing to help identify your optimal water treatment solution.

Leave a Message

Please contact us for free quotation by form below. We promise the quickest response within 24 hours:

Home Tel Mail Inquiry